Public proof engine

Review the proof pattern before you buy anything.

Free Builds now serve one job: show how Forecast Integrity Partners finds hidden defects in dashboards, metrics, forecasts, AI summaries, reporting workflows, and board-facing numbers.

No replay is promised here until a live video asset exists. Current public proof is the memo and diagram library below.

Next live build

Next live build: schedule to be posted here.

Until the first replay is embedded, this page should not pretend a video exists. The public proof layer is live through the three proof memos below.

What a live build must prove

  • Trace the number from source to decision
  • Expose hidden assumptions and logic breaks
  • Separate tool output from decision-quality evidence
  • Name the paid review path without giving away diagnosis for free

Proof memos

Three narrow examples of the defects FIP is built to catch.

These are synthetic, public, non-client proof assets. They are deliberately simple so the risk pattern is visible fast.

Proof memo 1

ARR Dashboard Overstatement diagram

ARR Dashboard Overstatement

Visible claim: Board-facing ARR looked clean and stable.

Hidden defect: The dashboard mixed account grain, subscription grain, opportunity status, and renewal logic. Expansion revenue could be counted at close and again when the renewed subscription became active.

Executive risk: Leadership may overstate recurring revenue, overhire, misread retention, or present a valuation story that cannot survive diligence.

Proof memo 2

LTV / CAC Misallocation diagram

LTV / CAC Misallocation

Visible claim: Acquisition economics appeared attractive by channel.

Hidden defect: Customer cohorts, acquisition cost windows, payback period, retention curves, discounts, and account expansion were blended across incompatible time windows.

Executive risk: Capital can shift toward channels that look efficient only because cost and value are not matched to the same customer, period, and retention behavior.

Proof memo 3

Board Forecast Fragility diagram

Board Forecast Fragility

Visible claim: The board forecast looked ready for executive presentation.

Hidden defect: The model depended on hidden overrides, stale drivers, weak downside cases, manually pasted actuals, and assumptions that were no longer tied to owned business logic.

Executive risk: A confident board narrative can be built on fragile logic. Hiring, budget, runway, revenue commitments, and investor confidence can all be distorted.

Public proof table

What each proof memo shows.

Proof assetHidden defectExecutive riskLikely paid path
ARR Dashboard OverstatementMixed grain across CRM, subscription, opportunity, renewal, and churn logic.Overstated revenue, weak valuation story, bad hiring or budget signal.Analytics Debt Ledger
LTV / CAC MisallocationCohorts, costs, channels, retention, and payback windows blended incorrectly.Capital shifts toward channels that only look efficient because the math is misaligned.Ledger or Spend Review
Board Forecast FragilityHidden overrides, stale drivers, manually pasted actuals, and weak downside logic.Board package appears ready while the operating logic remains fragile.Ledger or Board-Ready Sprint

Start with proof

Use the public examples, then move real company risk into paid scope.

Public content can show the pattern. Confidential dashboards, SQL, forecasts, board packages, AI summaries, or diligence metrics belong in a scoped review.